Reference Guide

Table of Authorities example and formatting guide.

A sample TOA for a federal motion, the formatting conventions behind each section, and how the table is generated automatically inside Microsoft Word.

Sample

A Table of Authorities for a motion to dismiss.

The example below follows a common federal district court structure. Entries are grouped by authority type, ordered within each group, and paired with every page on which they appear.

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES

Cases

Alphabetical by case name
  • Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009)3, 7, 12
  • Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007)4, 9
  • Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317 (1986)11
  • Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharm., Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993)14
  • Erie R.R. Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 (1938)6

Statutes

Numerical by title and section
  • 28 U.S.C. § 13312
  • 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)2, 5
  • 42 U.S.C. § 198310

Rules

Numerical by rule number
  • Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2)4
  • Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6)1, 5, 8
  • Fed. R. Evid. 70214

Other Authorities

Alphabetical by author or title
  • 5B Charles Alan Wright & Arthur R. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 1357 (3d ed.)8
  • Restatement (Second) of Torts § 402A (1965)13

Illustrative sample. Always confirm structure and citation format against the applicable local rules and judge's standing orders.

Formatting Requirements

Six rules that decide whether a TOA is filing-ready.

01

Group authorities by category

Most courts expect separate headings for Cases, Statutes, Rules, Regulations, and Other Authorities. Check the local rules — some jurisdictions add or merge categories.

02

Order entries consistently

Cases run alphabetically by name; statutes and rules run numerically. Do not order by page of first appearance.

03

Cite every page of appearance

Each entry lists every page where the authority appears, in ascending order. Use passim only where local rules permit it, typically for five or more scattered references.

04

Italicize case names

Case names are italicized in the TOA exactly as they appear in the brief, including short-form parties and procedural phrases.

05

Match the brief's citation format

The TOA reproduces the full citation as used in the brief — Bluebook, ALWD, or a court-specific format — so verify the brief first, then build the table.

06

Rebuild after every edit

Page numbers shift with every revision. A TOA generated before final formatting is almost always wrong at filing.

In Microsoft Word

The same table, generated from the brief itself.

Instead of marking citations by hand, the Mensrea.ai plug-in detects authorities in the document, sorts them into categories, and builds the table with current page numbers — inside the drafting environment attorneys already use.

Motion_to_Dismiss_v7.docx — Microsoft Word
Mensrea.ai · TOA
FileHomeInsertLayoutReferencesMensrea.aiReview

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES

Cases
  • Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009)3, 7, 12
  • Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007)4, 9
  • Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317 (1986)11
  • Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharm., Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993)14
  • Erie R.R. Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 (1938)6
Statutes
  • 28 U.S.C. § 13312
  • Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6)1, 5, 8
TOA AssistantApproved
Citations detected
47
across 6 categories
Cases23
Statutes9
Rules6
Treatises4
Regulations3
Other2
Jurisdiction: S.D.N.Y. · Bluebook 21st
Automate the TOA

Stop rebuilding the table by hand.

See how Table of Authorities automation works inside Microsoft Word.